Player violence or violent players? Vicarious liability for sports participants
James, MD and McArdle, D 2004, 'Player violence or violent players? Vicarious liability for sports participants' , Tort Law Review, 12 (3) , pp. 131-146.
|PDF - Accepted Version |
Download (159kB) | Preview
|Microsoft Word - Accepted Version |
Restricted to Repository staff only
This article analyses two recent English cases concerning the law on vicarious liability for acts of violence and considers their significance in respect of on-field acts of violence in contact sports. It provides an overview of how the law of negligence has developed in the specific context of sports injuries (including the application of the defence of volenti) and critiques the application of vicarious liability to sports cases. This is followed by a consideration of the wider law on vicarious liability for violent employees through a review of Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd  UKHL 22 and a deeper consideration of Mattis v Pollock  EWCA Civ 887. The article continues with an analysis of how those decisions have changed the legal landscape in respect of violent sports participants, looking in particular at reported cases from three jurisdictions in which that issue has been raised.
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > K Law > K Law (General)|
Subjects / Themes > G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV0557 Sports
Subjects outside of the University Themes
|Schools:||Colleges and Schools > College of Business & Law > Salford Business School > International Strategy People Management & Salford Law|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Tort Law Review|
|Depositing User:||H Kenna|
|Date Deposited:||13 Jan 2009 09:38|
|Last Modified:||29 Oct 2013 13:54|
Document DownloadsMore statistics for this item...
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|