Blakemore, D and Carston, R 2005, 'The pragmatics of sentential co-ordination with and' , Lingua, 115 (4) , pp. 569-589.Full text not available from this repository.
It is well known that utterances of certain and-conjunctions communicate a range of temporal and consequence relations between the states of affairs described by their conjuncts, and there are well established pragmatic accounts of how these elements of meaning arise. Our main focus in this paper is on a different set of and-conjunction utterances, which have so far received much less attention. These examples do not have a narrative function, so temporal and causal relations are not at issue. There are broadly two types of case: those that play an argumentational role and those that express an attitude of surprise/disquiet to the co-occurrence of two states of affairs. We develop a relevance-theoretic pragmatic account of the full range of interpretations and show how it is able to explain (i) the interpretive disparities between and-utterances and the corresponding cases with but, and (ii) why and may be used together with some discourse markers, such as moreover, but not with others.
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > P Language and Literature > PE English
Subjects / Themes > P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Memory, Text and Place
|Schools:||Schools > School of Humanities, Languages & Social Sciences > Centre for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
Schools > School of Humanities, Languages & Social Sciences
|Journal or Publication Title:||Lingua|
|Depositing User:||H Kenna|
|Date Deposited:||26 Sep 2007 12:58|
|Last Modified:||30 Nov 2015 23:39|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|