Enacted others: specifying Goffman's phenomenological omissions and sociological accomplishments
Smith, GWH 2005, 'Enacted others: specifying Goffman's phenomenological omissions and sociological accomplishments' , Human Studies, 28 (4) , pp. 397-415.
|PDF - Published Version |
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (124kB) | Request a copy
Erving Goffman's distinctive contribution to an understanding of others was grounded in his information control and ritual models of the interaction process. This contribution centered on the forms of the interaction order rather than self-other relations as traditionally conceived in phenomenology. Goffman came to phenomenology as a sympathetic but critical outsider who sought resources for the sociological mining of the interaction order. His engagement with phenomenological thinkers (principally Gustav Ichheiser, Jean-Paul Sartre and Alfred Schutz) has to be understood in these terms. The article traces basic differences in analytical focus through a range of phenomenological critiques of Goffman and a comparison of salient aspects of Schutz's and Goffman's writings. While the contrasts have perhaps been overplayed, I conclude that Goffman's thinking about others probably owed more to his pragmatist roots than to his later encounters with phenomenology.
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > H Social Sciences > HM Sociology|
Subjects outside of the University Themes
|Schools:||Colleges and Schools > College of Arts & Social Sciences > School of Humanities, Languages & Social Sciences > Centre for Social Research (CSR. Salford)|
Colleges and Schools > College of Arts & Social Sciences
Colleges and Schools > College of Arts & Social Sciences > School of Humanities, Languages & Social Sciences
|Journal or Publication Title:||Human Studies|
|Depositing User:||H Kenna|
|Date Deposited:||03 Feb 2009 15:40|
|Last Modified:||20 Aug 2013 16:54|
Document DownloadsMore statistics for this item...
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|