Skip to the content

The use of physical intervention in acute mental healthcare: decision-making and rationalisation among healthcare staff.

Prosser, H 2009, The use of physical intervention in acute mental healthcare: decision-making and rationalisation among healthcare staff. , in: BSA Medical Sociology Group 41st Annual Conference , University of Manchester, UK, 3-5 September 2009.

[img] Microsoft PowerPoint - Presentation
Download (379kB)

    Abstract

    Physical intervention (PI) is “a skilled hands-on method of physical restraint involving trained designated healthcare professionals (aiming) to prevent individuals from harming themselves, endangering others or seriously compromising the therapeutic environment” (NICE, 2005). Although intended as a protective strategy, its use is controversial. It has both physical and psychological outcomes for service users and is increasingly seen as incompatible with claims of best practice and values of respect, dignity and autonomy. It is distressing for service users and usually experienced by them as abusive. Moreover, the use of restraint in a horizontal position has led to fatalities in acute mental health services. As such, its use can generate significant ethical conflict for mental healthcare staff. This paper brings a sociological perspective to our understanding of the reasons why, and the circumstances in which, PI is used, in order to reflect on, and potentially improve, organisational practice. Staff from an acute mental health unit were recruited to the study following involvement in a PI incident. The meanings of PI and how staff account for its use were explored through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Discursive accounts of PI reveal 5 interrelated themes through which decision-making is constructed and PI rationalized: specifics of service user behaviour; routinisation; control; risk/uncertainty; ideologies and values. Accounts also reveal the ambivalent constructs of PI as a protective device and as a strategy for management and control. Implications for practice, organisational change and staff training on managing violence and aggression are discussed.

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
    Themes: Health and Wellbeing
    Schools: Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care
    Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care > School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences > Centre for Social Justice Research
    Refereed: Yes
    Depositing User: H Prosser
    Date Deposited: 07 Sep 2011 11:02
    Last Modified: 20 Aug 2013 18:08
    URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/17548

    Actions (login required)

    Edit record (repository staff only)

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics