Nonlinear wave phenomena at optical boundaries: spatial soliton refraction
McCoy, EA, Christian, JM and McDonald, GS 2011, Nonlinear wave phenomena at optical boundaries: spatial soliton refraction , in: 2nd CSE Doctoral School Postgraduate Research Conference, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.

PDF
 Published Version
Download (631kB)  Preview 
Abstract
The behaviour of light at the interface between different materials underpins the entire field of Optics. Arguably the simplest manifestation of this phenomenon – the reflection and refraction characteristics of (infinitelywide) plane waves at the boundary between two linear dielectric materials – can be found in many standard textbooks on electromagnetism (for instance, see Ref. 1). However, laser sources tend to produce collimated output in the form of a beam (whose transverse crosssection is typically “bellshaped” and, hence, finite). When describing light beyond the planewave limit, a more involved and sophisticated treatment is generally required. If a beam of light is propagating in a nonlinear planar waveguide, its innate tendency to diffract (spread out) may be compensated by the selflensing properties of the host medium (whose refractive index is intensitydependent). Such nonlinear photonic systems are driven and dominated by complex lightmedium feedback loops. Under the right conditions (e.g., where the amplitude and phase of the input beam have the correct transverse distribution), the light may evolve with a stationary (invariant) intensity profile. Such selflocalizing and selfstabilizing nonlinear waves are known as spatial optical solitons. The seminal analyses of spatial soliton refraction were performed by Aceves, Moloney, and Newell [2,3] more than two decades ago. They reduced the full electromagnetic complexity of the interface problem by adopting the scalar approximation, and describing the light field within an intuitive (paraxial) nonlinear Schrödingertype framework. In this way, they provided the first description of how light beams behave when impinging on the boundary between two dissimilar Kerrtype materials. These early, groundbreaking works yielded a great deal of physical insight. However, the assumption of beam paraxiality necessarily restricts the angles of incidence, reflection, and refraction (relative to the interface) to negligibly (or nearnegligibly) small values. Ideally, one would like to find a way of lifting this inherent angular limitation without forfeiting a straightforward and analyticallytractable governing equation. Recently, the seminal works of Aceves et al. [2,3] have been built upon by our Group. A new modelling formalism has been developed, based on an inhomogeneous nonlinear Helmholtz equation, whose flexibility accommodates both bright [4,5] and dark [6,7] spatial solitons at arbitrary angles of incidence, reflection, and refraction with respect to the interface. The use of Helmholtztype nonparaxial models allows for a complete angular characterization of spatial solitons, which is crucial in studies of this type. Most recently, we have been investigating systematic generalizations of the Kerr response to capture higherorder medium effects. For instance, the classic powerlaw model [8] replaces terms at u^2 with the generic form u^q, where the exponent q assumed a continuum of values 0 < q < 4; exact analytical powerlaw Helmholtz solitons [9] can then be deployed as a nonlinear basis for analyzing refraction phenomena. This model plays a fundamental role in photonics, and can be used to capture, for instance, leadingorder effects due to saturation of the nonlinearoptical response. In this presentation we detail our latest research, which has investigated arbitraryangle scattering of spatial solitons at the planar boundary between two dissimilar cubicquintic optical materials [10,11]. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first time that refraction effects have been considered within this type of material context. The derivation of our novel Helmholtz refraction law will be discussed in detail. An illustrative selection of results will be presented, which compare theoretical predictions to full numerical computations. The level of agreement between the theoretical predictions and full numerical computations has been found to be generally excellent. Examples of the GoosHänchen shift (a phenomenon occurring close to the critical angle, where the trajectory of the reflected beam is displaced laterally relative to the path predicted by geometrical optics [12,13]) have also been uncovered.
Item Type:  Conference or Workshop Item (Lecture) 

Themes:  Energy Media, Digital Technology and the Creative Economy Subjects outside of the University Themes 
Schools:  Schools > School of Computing, Science and Engineering > Salford Innovation Research Centre (SIRC) 
Refereed:  Yes 
Depositing User:  JM Christian 
Date Deposited:  17 Oct 2011 10:44 
Last Modified:  29 Oct 2015 00:10 
References:  [1] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics 3rd Ed., 1999 John Wiley & Sons (New York). [2] A. B. Aceves, J. V. Moloney, and A. C. Newell, “Theory of lightbeam propagation at nonlinear interfaces. I. Equivalentparticle theory for a single interface,” Phys. Rev. A 39, 1809–1828 (1989). [3] A. B. Aceves, J. V. Moloney, and A. C. Newell, “Theory of lightbeam propagation at nonlinear interfaces. II. Multipleparticle and multipleinterface extensions,” Phys. Rev. A 39, 1828–1840 (1989). [4] J. SánchezCurto, P. ChamorroPosada, and G. S. McDonald, “Helmholtz solitons at nonlinear interfaces,” Opt. Lett. 32, 1126–1128 (2007). [5] J. SánchezCurto, P. ChamorroPosada, and G. S. McDonald, “Nonlinear interfaces: intrinsically nonparaxial regimes and effects,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11, art. no. 054015 (2009). [6] J. SánchezCurto, P. ChamorroPosada, and G. S. McDonald, “Dark solitons at nonlinear interfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 1347–1349 (2010). [7] J. SanchezCurto, P. ChamorroPosada and G. S. McDonald, “Black and grey Helmholz Kerr soliton refraction,” Phys. Rev. A 83, art. no. 013828 (2011). [8] D. Mihalache, M. Bertolotti, and C. Sibilia, “Nonlinear wave propagation in planar structures,” Prog. Opt. 27, 229– 313 (1989). [9] J. M. Christian, G.S. McDonald, R. J. Potton, and P. ChamorroPosada, “Helmholtz solitons in powerlaw optical materials,” Phys. Rev. A 76, art. no. 033834 (2007). [10] Kh. I. Pushkarov, D. I. Pushkarov, and I. V. Tomov, “Selfaction of light beams in nonlinear media: soliton solutions,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 11, 471–478 (1979). [11] J. M. Christian, G. S. McDonald, and P. ChamorroPosada, “Helmholtz solitons in cubicquintic materials,” Phys. Rev. A 76, art. no. 033833 (2007). [12] F. Goos and H. Hänchen, “Ein neuer und fundamentaler Versuch zur Totalreflexion,” Ann. Phys. 1, 336–346 (1947). [13] J. SánchezCurto, P. ChamorroPosada, and G. S. McDonald, “GoosHänchen shifts and radiationinduced trapping of Helmholtz solitons at nonlinear interfaces,” Opt. Lett. 36, 3605–3607 (2011). 
URI:  http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/18413 
Actions (login required)
Edit record (repository staff only) 
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year