Hollins Martin, Caroline J 2007, 'How can we improve choice provision for childbearing women?' , British Journal of Midwifery, 15 (8) , pp. 480-484.
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (199kB) | Request a copy
Obedience research has shown that under situational pressures and within hierarchical relationships, people have a propensity towards submission to authority (Milgram, 1974). Once they have done so, their actions are no longer guided by their own values but by the desire to fulfill authority’s wishes (Meeus and Raaijmakers, 1995). When an authority figure gives direction, this may clash with a midwife’s knowledge of a woman’s preferred choice. Hollins Martin and Bull (2005) showed the success that a senior midwife had at socially influencing decisions of more junior midwives, even when the outcome contravened their established views of best practice. Hollins Martin and Bull (2006) showed that choice provision for childbearing women was difficult to provide because of the imposition of hospital protocols, the hierarchy and fears of challenging senior people. Acknowledging these identified constraints this paper poses eight plausible solutions to facilitate midwives with providing the choice that is advocated in social policy documents (Department of Health, 1993; DH, 2003; DH, 2004).
|Themes:||Health and Wellbeing|
|Schools:||Schools > School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences > Centre for Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences Research
Schools > School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences
|Journal or Publication Title:||British Journal of Midwifery|
|Publisher:||Mark Allen Healthcare|
|Depositing User:||CJ Hollins-Martin|
|Date Deposited:||23 Dec 2011 09:33|
|Last Modified:||30 Nov 2015 23:48|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|