Arntzen, JW, Goudie, I, Halley, J and Jehle, R 2004, 'Cost comparison of marking techniques in long-term population studies: PIT-tags versus pattern maps' , Amphibia-Reptilia, 25 (3) , pp. 305-315.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (845kB) | Request a copy
Conservation biology requires the assessment of demographic parameters and life-history data in wildlife populations. Such data can be gathered through capture-mark-recapture (CMR) of individuals. Marking techniques may vary for study organisms, research objectives and conditions, but all CMR studies have in common that the workload and expenditure is substantial, urging for cost-effective planning.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Population studies, Marking, Biology, Conservation, Capture-mark-recapture, Cost-benefit|
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > Q Science > QH Natural history > QH001 General, inc. conservation, geographical distribution
Subjects / Themes > Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Subjects outside of the University Themes
|Schools:||Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences
Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences > Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre
|Journal or Publication Title:||Amphibia-Reptilia|
|Depositing User:||Institutional Repository|
|Date Deposited:||28 Aug 2009 10:49|
|Last Modified:||01 Dec 2015 00:02|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|