Cost comparison of marking techniques in long-term population studies: PIT-tags versus pattern maps
Arntzen, JW, Goudie, I, Halley, J and Jehle, R 2004, 'Cost comparison of marking techniques in long-term population studies: PIT-tags versus pattern maps' , Amphibia-Reptilia, 25 (3) , pp. 305-315.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (825kB) | Request a copy
Conservation biology requires the assessment of demographic parameters and life-history data in wildlife populations. Such data can be gathered through capture-mark-recapture (CMR) of individuals. Marking techniques may vary for study organisms, research objectives and conditions, but all CMR studies have in common that the workload and expenditure is substantial, urging for cost-effective planning.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Population studies, Marking, Biology, Conservation, Capture-mark-recapture, Cost-benefit|
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > Q Science > QH Natural history > QH001 General, inc. conservation, geographical distribution|
Subjects / Themes > Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Subjects outside of the University Themes
|Schools:||Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology|
Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of Environment and Life Sciences
Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of Environment and Life Sciences > Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre
|Journal or Publication Title:||Amphibia-Reptilia|
|Depositing User:||Institutional Repository|
|Date Deposited:||28 Aug 2009 11:49|
|Last Modified:||20 Aug 2013 16:59|
Document DownloadsMore statistics for this item...
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|