Skip to the content

The effect of road narrowing on junction capacity using micro-simulation

Yousif, S, Alterawi, M and Henson, RR 2012, 'The effect of road narrowing on junction capacity using micro-simulation' , Journal of Transportation Engineering . (In Press)

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Traffic calming measures have been widely used in urban areas with the aim sometimes of reducing vehicles flow rates but mainly to reduce speed and hence the number and severity of traffic accidents. The one-way priority working road narrowing (throttle) is a widely used traffic calming technique. However, installation of such a measure close to a junction can severely affect the operation and level of service, especially for the major road movements. There is a lack of research, guidance and design standards to inform the effective deployment of such a measure. This paper starts by providing a summary of the terms and standards used in practice for traffic calming measures, mainly focusing on the use of throttles. The paper aims to investigate the relationship between throttle spacing (X) from a priority junction and the "major to major movement" driver's delay for different flow levels using the Paramics micro-simulation model. The model was calibrated and validated with field data taken from a selected site within Greater Manchester for two separate days using camcorders. Cooperative behavior between drivers (i.e. those with priority who gave way to others) was noticed and analyzed accordingly. Different scenarios were used to test the effects on delays and queues for various parameters including throttle spacing (X), major arms flow level and reversing the direction of priority. The findings show that there is a direct relationship between throttle spacing (X) and the level of delay for traffic on the major arms of the junction. It is also shown that for a minor arm two-way flow level of up to 500 veh/hr, the throttle spacing should be at least 30 meters. Once the flow level reaches 700 veh/hr, the spacing should be at least 50 meters while for flow levels of 800 veh/hr, the spacing should be at least 100 meters. Alternatively, consideration should be given to reversing the priority given to traffic by using MJTP operation (MaJor arm Traffic has Priority) rather than MNTP (MiNor arm Traffic has Priority) if less throttle spacing (X) is required, to minimize delays to traffic on the major arms.

Item Type: Article
Themes: Built and Human Environment
Schools: Schools > School of Computing, Science and Engineering
Schools > School of Computing, Science and Engineering > Salford Innovation Research Centre (SIRC)
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 0733-947X
Funders: Non funded research
Depositing User: S Yousif
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2012 13:21
Last Modified: 30 Nov 2015 23:55
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/27360

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)