Skip to the content

Patients' experiences of day surgery: A parsonian analysis

Mottram, A 2011, 'Patients' experiences of day surgery: A parsonian analysis' , Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67 (1) , pp. 140-148.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Submitted Version
Download (97kB) | Preview
    [img] Microsoft Word - Submitted Version
    Restricted to Repository staff only

    Download (134kB)

      Abstract

      Aim: the aim of the study was to explore patients’ experiences of day surgery using a sociological framework of analysis. Background: although day surgery has increased globally in the last 20 years, little applied sociological research has been undertaken in this area. Method: the Glaserian methodology of Grounded Theory was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 145 patients and 100 carers on three occasions from 2004 to 2006. Analysis of the data involved line-by-line analysis, compilation of key words and phrases (codes) and constant comparison of the codes until core categories were identified. Findings: a major category to emerge from the data was the ambiguity presented to patients in relation to the sick role. Of concern to patients was society’s attitudes, which seem to deny to day surgery patients full entitlement to the privileges associated with the sick role. Day surgery patients wanted to feel comfortable in a role that was socially acceptable – the sick role. However, many patients actively resisted this role, and this could have implications for recovery. A large number of patients wished for a limited ascription of the sick role, whilst a minority actively sought to acquire this role. Conclusion: the importance of nurses in providing supportive, psychological care, and ensuring patient and carer understanding of what day surgery entails cannot be overstated. Day surgery personnel should teach that day surgery is not minor surgery and that recovery times may be protracted, during which patients will need support.

      Item Type: Article
      Themes: Subjects / Themes > R Medicine > RT Nursing
      Subjects / Themes > H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
      Health and Wellbeing
      Subjects outside of the University Themes
      Schools: Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care
      Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care > School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences
      Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Advanced Nursing
      Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
      Refereed: Yes
      ISSN: 0309-2402
      Related URLs:
      Funders: University of Salford
      Depositing User: A Mottram
      Date Deposited: 20 Jan 2010 11:17
      Last Modified: 20 Aug 2013 17:02
      References: References Brown J.S. & Rawlinson M. (1975) Relinquishing the Sick Role Following Open-Heart Surgery. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 16, 12-27. Chalfont H.P. & Kurtz R.A. (1971) Alcoholics and the Sick Role: Assessments by Social Workers. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 12, 66-72. Charmaz K. (1990) Discovering Chronic Illness: Using Grounded Theory. Social Science and Medicine 30, 1161-1172. Crossley M. (1998) ‘ck Role’ or ‘empowerment’? The ambiguities of life wit pdiagnosis. Sociology of Health and Illness 231 DiBenedetto-Carrato A. (2006) The relationship between the sick fl status in kidney transplant recipients. Und Doctoral Dissertation, New York University. USA. Fox N.J. (1992) The Socingery. Open University, Milton Keynes. Fried1970) The Profession of Medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowDoand Company, New York. Freund Peter E.S. & M.B. (2000) Health, Illness and the Social Body. Prentice Hall, Ny.her E. (1976) Lines of Reconstruction and Exin the Parsonian sociology of illness. Social Science and Medici07-hardt U. (1989) Ideas about illness -An inte and political history of Medical Sociology. Macmillan, Gil. (2007) Contemporary day surgery: patientiences of day surgery and recovery. Journal of Clinical Nursi09-18. Gla1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emv Forcing. Sociology Press, Mill Valley. CA. Glaser B. (199 Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glenton C. (2003) ‘Ch pain sufferers –striving for the Sickal Science and Medicine 57, 2243-2252. Goulding C. (20 Theory: A ide for Management, Business and Market Resee Publications, London. Gross-Stein J. (2001) The Cult y. Anasi Press, Toront R. (1998) Talcott Parsons in Stones R (Ed.)gical Thinkers. Palgrave, Basingstoke (p 96-108). Horton B. pemas. Journal of One Day Surgery 19, 72-73. Staniszewski A. (2006) The development of ambulatory sutus in Day Surgery Development and Practice (E.J., Jarrett, P. and Philip B. International Associatioorondon (p21-34). Jones J. (1999) Patient ExpDay Surgery. Unpublished Ph.D. Research and Graduate School of acational Studies. University of Southampton, U.K. Kubsch S. & Wichowski H. (1992) Identification and val niagnosis: a sick role conflict. Nursing Diagber ¾, 141-147. Kvale S. (1996) Interviews: an introdlich Interviewing. Sage, New York. Lambert C. (1981) Role theory and the concept of powerlessness. Jcho-g and Mental Health Services 1, 12- 19. Lofland L.H. (1983) Analyzing Social Settings. Wadsworth. 996) ‘Your life in their hands’: Tru encounter: in Health and the Sociology of the Emotions (Ee ll, Oxford. (p157-172). Minatti W.R., Flavio B., Pablo C., Raul R., Guillermo P.& Miguedi admission in ambulatory surgery: A prospecttory Surgery 12, 107-112. Mitchell M.J. (2003) Impact of discharrycarers. British Journal of Nursing 12, 402-4. (2006) Nursing Knowledge and the expansion of day surgery in m. y 12, 131-138. Nettleton S. (2006) The Socind Illness. Polity Press, Cambridge. Ojo E.O., Ihezue C.kum N.K. & Misauno M.A.y of Day Case Surgery in a Developing Countr-Day Surgery 18, 13-17. Parsons T. (1951) The Social SanCA. Parsons T. & Fox R. (1952) Illness, tdern urban family. Journal of Social Issues 8, 31-44. PMeSpiritual Malaise in Social Structure and Peress, New York. 292-324. Roth J. (1963) Timetables: studyi tieatment and other careers. Bobs- Merrill, Neng C. (2002) Culture, the ‘sick role’ and the consutigy. 53, 621-638 Solly J (2005) Presournal of One Day Surgery 15, 31-32 Smith I. (2006) Trying On31 Stockwell F. (1984) The Unpopular Pation. Strauss A.& Corbin J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Researrocedures and Techniques.gard C. & Parmentier G. (2006) Internationalatory Surgery and its worldwide practice in Day Surgery Development and P, Jarnational Association of Ambulatory Surgery, Turner B. (1991) Preface to the New Edition in Parsons T. (1Syon (p xiii-xxx.). ---------------position: form-data; name="c36_keywords" Day Surgery, Sick Role, Parsons, Sociology, Nursing,Grounded Theory, Nursing
      URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/2753

      Document Downloads

      More statistics for this item...

      Actions (login required)

      Edit record (repository staff only)