Evaluating summarised radionuclide concentration ratio datasets for wildlife
Wood, M, Beresford, NA, Howard, BJ and Copplestone, D 2013, 'Evaluating summarised radionuclide concentration ratio datasets for wildlife' , Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 126 , pp. 314-325.
PDF (Licence agreement)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (513kB) | Preview
PDF (CC BY licence)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (101kB) | Request a copy
Concentration ratios (CRwo-media) are used in most radioecological models to predict whole-body radionuclide activity concentrations in wildlife from those in environmental media. This simplistic approach amalgamates the various factors influencing transfer within a single generic value and, as a result, comparisons of model predictions with site-specific measurements can vary by orders of magnitude. To improve model predictions, the development of 'condition-specific' CRwo-media values has been proposed (e.g. for a specific habitat). However, the underlying datasets for most CRwo-media value databases, such as the wildlife transfer database (WTD) developed within the IAEA EMRAS II programme, include summarised data. This presents challenges for the calculation and subsequent statistical evaluation of condition-specific CRwo-media values. A further complication is the common use of arithmetic summary statistics to summarise data in source references, even though CRwo-media values generally tend towards a lognormal distribution and should, therefore, be summarised using geometric statistics. In this paper, we propose a statistically-defensible and robust method for reconstructing underlying datasets to calculate condition-specific CRwo-media values from summarised data and deriving geometric summary statistics. This method is applied to terrestrial datasets from the WTD. Statistically significant differences in sub-category CRwo-media values (e.g. mammals categorised by feeding strategy) were identified, which may justify the use of these CRwomedia values for specific assessment contexts. However, biases and limitations within the underlying datasets of the WTD explain some of these differences. Given the uncertainty in the summarised CRwo-media values, we suggest that the CRwo-media approach to estimating transfer is used with caution above screening-level assessments.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Radionuclide transfer, statistical analysis, geometric statistic, lognormal distribution, environmental assessment, model parameter|
|Themes:||Subjects outside of the University Themes|
|Schools:||Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences > Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre
Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of Environmental Radioactivity|
|Funders:||Vice-Chancellor's Early Career Research Scholarship, University of Salford|
|Depositing User:||S Rafiq|
|Date Deposited:||27 Sep 2013 17:49|
|Last Modified:||30 Nov 2015 23:54|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|