Skip to the content

Evaluation of continuous improvement programmes

Miron, L, Talebi, S, Koskela, L and Tezel, BA 2016, Evaluation of continuous improvement programmes , in: 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 18th to 24th July 2016, Boston, MA, USA.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (737kB) | Preview

Abstract

The study began with the problem posed by an organisation for a group of researchers in the UK. There was a need to carry out an in-depth study to evaluate the continuous improvement programmes in the context of Lean Construction, and the following question emerged: How to evaluate the continuous improvement programme? This paper aims to understand how the literature on continuous improvement, including quality circles (QCs), small group activities (SGAs), and continuous improvement cells (CICs), can help to conduct the evaluation of continuous improvement programmes. The paper includes a literature review to gain an understanding of the problem from a theoretical perspective. Continuous improvement techniques are assessed in the framework of the TFV theory, with the main focus on the flow and the waste concepts. A logic model framework is used to synthesize the literature review findings and to establish an initial proposal for the evaluation of continuous improvement programmes in the Lean Construction context. This paper does not include any empirical study or actual measure and cannot ascertain the definitive benefits of continuous improvement techniques. Also, the paper does not propose any definitive procedure on how to evaluate continuous improvement techniques.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Schools: Schools > School of the Built Environment
Journal or Publication Title: Proceedings 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Related URLs:
Depositing User: WM Taylor
Date Deposited: 18 Jul 2016 07:57
Last Modified: 26 Jul 2016 10:02
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/39417

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year