Logical ontology for mediating between nursing intervention terminology systems
Hardiker, NR 2003, 'Logical ontology for mediating between nursing intervention terminology systems' , Methods of Information in Medicine, 42 (3) , pp. 265-270.
| PDF - Published Version Download (77kB) | Preview | |
| Microsoft Word - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (82kB) |
Abstract
Objectives: Several researchers have proposed the use of logical ontologies as reference terminologies'. However, there are a number of unresolved issues. This article describes the development of a logical ontology for nursing interventions and presents the results of evaluation. Methods: Initially this study involved the development in GRAIL of two separate experimental ontologies: an ontology based on the textual content of informal definitions for nursing interventions drown from the Nursing interventions Classification; and an ontology based On labels for the some nursing interventions. Following initial bench-testing, the ontology based on labels was selected for extension (to accommodate also nursing intervention components of the Home Health Care Classification System and the Omaha System), for further testing and for external evaluation. Results: A hierarchy of nursing interventions generated automatically from the experimental antolagy based on informal definitions cantained only 3 hierarchical relationships, compared to 214 for the initial ontology based on labels. For the final extended ontology based on labels, the generated hierarchy contained the three source terminology systems in entirety - there were a total of 2861 hierarchical relationships. While the results of comporative bench testing of the final ontology were fovourable, the results of external evaluation were mixed and showed little agreement between reviewers. Conclusion: This study suggests that while a logical ontology based on labels might be a useful tool for mediating between nursing intervention terminology systems, a formative consensus type development methodology might improve the approach by helping to harmonise ideological differences that may exist across the nursing profession.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nursing, terminology, classification |
| Themes: | Subjects / Themes > R Medicine > R Medicine (General) Subjects / Themes > R Medicine > RT Nursing Subjects / Themes > Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZA Information resources Health and Wellbeing |
| Schools: | Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care > School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work > Centre for Nursing & Midwifery Research Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care Colleges and Schools > College of Health & Social Care > School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Methods of Information in Medicine |
| Publisher: | Schattauer |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| ISSN: | 00261270 |
| Depositing User: | H Kenna |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Aug 2007 13:22 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2011 11:44 |
| URI: | http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/42 |
Document Downloads
More statistics for this item...Actions (login required)
| Edit record (repository staff only) |

Tools
Tools