Which kind of science is construction management?
Koskela, LJ 2008, Which kind of science is construction management? , in: 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 16th-18th July 2008, Manchester, UK.
- Published Version
Download (20MB) | Preview
It is argued that the mainstream views on the nature of construction management are insufficient, and as one consequence of this, the relevance of construction management has been questioned. As a solution to this situation, construction management is suggested to be repositioned as a design science, rather than as an explanatory science. A historical consideration reveals that design science equals to one of the sciences proposed by Aristotle, however, the suggestion of Aristotle has been forgotten. Thus, there has been a long-standing neglect of the design science, which explains the present fragmentation of this field. It is argued that this redefinition of construction management will solve several problems plaguing this discipline, including the problem of relevance.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||construction management, natural science, social science, science of production, design science, constructive research|
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > T Technology > TH Building construction
Subjects / Themes > T Technology > TS Manufactures > TS155-194 Production management. Operations management
Built and Human Environment
Subjects outside of the University Themes
|Schools:||Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment
Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment > Salford Centre for Research & Innovation (SCRI)
|Journal or Publication Title:||Proceedings for the 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction|
|Publisher:||The University of Salford|
|Depositing User:||LJ Koskela|
|Date Deposited:||11 Jun 2010 12:28|
|Last Modified:||20 Aug 2013 16:18|
|References:||Alsehaimi, A. & Koskela, L. (2008) What can be learned from studies on delay in construction? International Group of Lean Construction Conference, Manchester. Aristotle (2004) Metaphysics. Book Zeta 7. In Lawson-Tancred H (2004) The Metaphysics. Penguin Books, London. Ballard, G. & Howell, G. 1998. Shielding Production: Essential Step in Production Control. Journal of Construction Eng. and Mgmt, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 - 17. Barley, Stephen R, Kunda, Gideon (2001) Bringing Work Back In. Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 76-95. Barnes, J. (2000) Aristotle – A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. Beamish, Anne (2008) Learning from work. Stanford University Press. Boland R. & Collopy F. (Ed.) (2004) Managing as Designing. Stanford University Press. Bon, R. (2002) Who's an author and who's not. E-mail message to the CNBR-list, July 3, 2002. Davies, H. (2006) Improving the Relevance of Management Research: Evidence-Based Management: Design Science or Both? Business Leadership Review Vol. III, No. III. Fellows, R. & Liu, A. (2008) Research Methods for Construction. Blackwell. Hatchuel, A. (2005) Towards an epistemology of collective action: management research as a responsive and actionable discipline. European Management Review, Vol. 2, pp. 36-47. Hevner, A.R., March, Salvatore T., Park, Jinsoo, Ram, Sudha (2004) Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 75-105. Järvinen, P. (2004) On Research Methods. Opinpajan kirja, Tampere. Järvinen, P. (2007) Action Research is Similar to Design Science. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 41, pp. 37-54. Kasanen, E., Lukka, K., Siitonen, A. (1993) The Constructive Approach in Management Accounting Research. Journal of Mgmt Accounting Research. Koskela, Lauri & Kagioglou, Mike, (2006) The Proto-Theory of Design: the method of analysis of the ancient geometers. Proceedings of the Design 2006, 9th International Design Conference. Koskela, L., Codinhoto, R. Tzortzopoulos, P. & Kagioglou, M. (2008) The Method of Analysis of The Ancient Geometers as The Proto-Theory of Design. Manuscript submitted for publication. Love, P. E.D., Holt, G. D., Li, H. (2002) Triangulation in construction management research. Eng., Construction and Architectural Mgmt, Vol. 9, No: 4, pp. 294-303. March, S.T. & Smith, G.F. (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems Vol. 15, Nr. 4, pp. 251 – 266. Orlikowski, Wanda (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1435-1448. Schmenner, R.W. & Swink, M.L. (1998) On theory in operations management. Journal of Operations Management Vol. 17, pp. 97-113. Seymour, D.E. & Rooke, J. (1995) The culture of the industry and the culture of research. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 511-523. Simon, H.A. (1969) The sciences of the artificial. The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (MA). Vaishnavi, V. & Kuechler, B. (2004) Design Research in Information Systems. Available at http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm Van Aken, J.E. (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, Nr. 2, pp. 219 – 246.|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|