Can procurement affect design performance?
Forgues, D and Koskela, LJ 2008, 'Can procurement affect design performance?' , Journal of Construction Procurement, 14 (2) , pp. 130-141.
|PDF - Published Version |
Download (4MB) | Preview
There is an emerging view in the construction industry that better performance or better value for money can be achieved by integrating teamwork for planning, design and construction of building projects. There are though, two opposing perspectives regarding how changes in traditional design practices should occur. Advocates of sustainable construction in North America posit that it is a matter of evolving processes, moving from a sequential to an iterative approach to design, whereas the British government supports the view that a change in how projects are procured is required to transform the context that dictates relationships among the members of the team. The objective of the research is to study the influence of procurement on the performance of integrated design teams. It analyses, through case studies representing these two perspectives, the influence of procurement on the performance of integrated teams. The research is conclusive in that it is the context created by contractual relationship, and not the process set up for conducting integrated design, that most influence team efficiency. It demonstrates that traditional procurement processes reinforce socio-cognitive barriers that hinder team efficiency. It also illustrates how new procurement modes can transform the dynamics of relationships between the client and the members of the supply chain, and have a positive impact on team performance.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Integrated team , integrated design ; Procurement; Team dynamics|
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > T Technology > TH Building construction|
Subjects / Themes > T Technology > TS Manufactures > TS155-194 Production management. Operations management
Built and Human Environment
Subjects outside of the University Themes
|Schools:||Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment|
Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment > Salford Centre for Research & Innovation (SCRI)
|Journal or Publication Title:||Journal of Construction Procurement|
|Publisher:||International Procurement Research Group|
|Depositing User:||LJ Koskela|
|Date Deposited:||11 Jun 2010 13:47|
|Last Modified:||20 Aug 2013 17:18|
|References:||Ancona, D. G. (2005) Managing for the future: organizational behavior & processes, South-Western College Pub, Cincinnati, Ohio. Austin, S. A. (2001) Design Chains: A Handbook for Integrated Collaborative Design, Thomas Telford, London. Blackler, F., Crump, N. and McDonald, S. (1999) Managing experts and competing through innovation: an activity theoretical analysis. Organization, 6, 5-31. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2001) Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198-213. Carlilse, P. R. (2002) A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science, 13, 442-455. Comptroller and Auditor General (2001) Modernising Construction. House of Commons, London. Druskat, U. (2002) The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55, 283. Dupagne, A. (1991) Computer Integrated Building . Strategic final Report. Exploratory action NO 5604. ESPRIT II. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R. and Liston, K. (2008 ) BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modelling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force. DETR, London. Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R. and Karkkainen, T. (1995) Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and instruction, 5, 319-136. Froese, T. and Aranda-Mena, G. (2008) Structuring the business case for BIM. CSCE 2008 Annual Conference. Quebec, Canada. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the corporation a manifesto for business revolution, Harper Business, New York. Henderson, J. C. and Venkatraman, N. (1999) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 38, 472. Huovila, P., Koskela, L. and Lautanala, M. (1997) Fast or Concurrent: The Art of Getting Construction Improved. In: Alarcon, L. (Ed.) Lean Construction. Taylor & Francis, London. Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B. A. (2006) Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design, The MIT Press, Boston. Koskela, L. (2000) An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Technical Research Centre of Finland Finland. Koskela, L., Howell, G. and Lichtig, W. (2006) Contracts and production. CIBW92. Salford Koskinen, K., Makinen S. (2009) Role of boundary objects in negotiations of project contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 31-38. Langley, A. (1999) Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710. Larsson, N. (2002 ) The Integrated Design Process. Report on a National Workshop. Ottawa, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa. Latham, S. M. (1994) Constructing the Team. HMSO. London, UK. Lawson, B. (2006) How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Architectural Press, Oxford. Lohnert, G., Dalkowski, A. and Sutter, W. (2002) Integrated Design Process, A Guideline for Sustainable and Solar-Optimised Building Design. Task 23. Berlin/Zug, IEA. Moore, D. R. and Dainty, A. R. J. (2001) Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for change. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 559-562. Nardi, B. A. (1996) Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Technology, M. I. O. (Ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, 69-102. NHS (2005) Case studies, National Health Service, Leeds. Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Schon, D. A. (1995) The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, Surrey. Smulders, F., Lousberg, L. and Dorst, K. (2008) Towards different communication in Collaborative Design. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1, 352-367. Stasser, G. and Titus , W. (1987) Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53, 81-93. Strategic Forum (2003) Integrated Project Team. London, The Strategic Forum for Construction, London. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research, International Educational and Professional Publisher, Thousand Oaks. Tory, M., Staub-French , S., Po, B . A. and Wu, F. (2008) Physical and Digital Artifact-Mediated Coordination in Building Design. 17, 311-351. Van De Ven, A. H. (2007) Engaged Scholarship: Creating Knowledge for Science and Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Weick, K. E. and Roberts, K. H. (1993) Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 387-351. Zager, D. (2006) Collaboration as an Activity Coordinating with Pseudo-Collective Objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11, 181-204 Zimmerman, A. (2006) Guide sur le processus de conception integree. SCHL, Ottawa.|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|