How can construction research be organized? An overseas comment on the Fairclough Review.
Koskela, LJ 2002, 'How can construction research be organized? An overseas comment on the Fairclough Review.' , Building Research & Information, 30 (5) , pp. 305-311.
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Assesses the government report created by Sir John Fairclough which reviewed governmental research and development policies and practices in Great Britain. Identification of four separate roles of the government and the construction industry; Mission statement about the construction industry's contribution to the world and the quality of life agenda; Issues of the construction research system.
|Themes:||Subjects / Themes > T Technology > TH Building construction
Built and Human Environment
|Schools:||Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment
Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment > Centre for Built Environment Sustainability and Transformation (BEST)
|Journal or Publication Title:||Building Research & Information|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis|
|Depositing User:||LJ Koskela|
|Date Deposited:||25 Jun 2010 10:52|
|Last Modified:||29 Oct 2015 01:16|
|References:||Betts, M.; Lansley, P. (1993) Construction management and economics; the first ten years; Construction Management and Economics; Vol. 11, 221-245. Construction Industry Institute. <http://construction-institute.org/> Co-operative Research Centre for Construction Innovation. <http://>www.cmp.bee.qut.edu.au/crc/> Egan, Sir J. (1998) Rethinking construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London Fairclough, Sir J. (2002) Rethinking Construction Innovation and Research: A Review of Government R&D Policies and Practices, Department of Trade and Industry, London. Fenves, S.J. (1996) The penetration of information technologies into civil and structural engineering design: state-of-the-art and directions toward the future, in B. Kumar and A. Retik (eds): Information Representation and Delivery in Civil and Structural Engineering Design, Civil Comp Press, Edinburg 1-5. Gann, D.; Salter, A.; Moles-Gallatt, J.; Cleasby, B.; Senker, J.; Martin, B. (2002) Underpinning analysis, in Sir J. Fairclough: Rethinking Construction Innovation and Research: A Review of Government R&D Policies and Practices, Departmentof Trade and Industry, London, pp. 39-93. Halpin, D.W. (1993) Process-based research to meet the internation challenge. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 417-425. International Group for Lean COnstruction. <http://www.iglc.net/> Koskela, L. (2000) An Exploration Towards a Production Theory and its Application to Construction. VTT Publications, Espoo. Koskela, L. and Vrijhoef, R. (2001) Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? Building Research and Information, 29(3), 197-207. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (2nd edition), University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Lean COnstruction Institute. <http://www.leanconstruction.org> Manseau, A. and Seadon, G. (Eds) (2001) Innovation in Construction: An International Review of Public Policies, SPON, London. National Economic Development Office (1991) Guidelines for the Management of Major Construction Projects, HMSO, London. Palmberg, C. (2001) Sectoral Patterns of Innovation and Competence Requirements - A Closer Look at Low-Tech Industries, Sitra Report Series 8, Sitra, Helsinki. Runeson, G. and Loosemore, M. (1999) Gate-keepers or judges: peer reviews in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 17(4) 529-536. Seppanen, O. (1999) Estimated cost of indoor climate in Finnish buildings, in Indoor Air '99: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate Edinburgh, UK, 8-13 August p13-18. Shingo, S. (1998) Non-Stock Production, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA. Sloan Management Review (2002) Building scientific networks for effective innovation, Sloan Management Review, Spring 14. Teaching Company Scheme. <http://www.tcsonline.org.uk>|
Actions (login required)
|Edit record (repository staff only)|