Skip to the content

On new footnotes to Shingo

Koskela, LJ 2001, On new footnotes to Shingo , in: 9th International Group for Lean Construction Conference., August 2001, National University of Singapore.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (49kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    The Toyota Production System (TPS) has continually inspired scholars of production management to a search for its essence. Two new interpretations have recently been advanced. Firstly, Johnston has argued that conventional production management is based on an approach to management called management-as-planning. The central assumption is that intentional activity is based on a representation of the world. Thus, management is essentially about planning, i.e. manipulation of that representation. Instead, the TPS is essentially based on an approach called management-as-organizing. Here it is assumed that human activity is inherently situated, i.e. a response to the situation in question. Secondly, Spear and Bowen have claimed that the key to understand the TPS is the idea of the scientific method. When a production standard is defined, it also establishes a hypothesis that can be tested. Thus, they seem to emphasize the approach of management-as-learning as the foundational idea behind the TPS. It is shown that while providing fresh and deeper understanding to management in the TPS, these interpretations are partial and can be positioned inside the view on production management presented by Shingo. In fact, based on Shingo and other extant analysis, it can be argued that there are four approaches to management that are applied in tight coupling and synergistically in the TPS: management-as-organizing, management-as-planning, management-as-adhering and management-as-learning. It is concluded that the superiority of the TPS in comparison to its rivals is founded not only on a better theory of production, but also on a better theory of management.

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Toyota production system, management, organizing, planning, adhering, learning.
    Themes: Subjects / Themes > T Technology > TS Manufactures > TS155-194 Production management. Operations management
    Subjects outside of the University Themes
    Schools: Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment
    Colleges and Schools > College of Science & Technology > School of the Built Environment > Salford Centre for Research & Innovation (SCRI)
    Journal or Publication Title: Proceedings of 9th International Group for Lean Construction Conference.
    Refereed: Yes
    Depositing User: LJ Koskela
    Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2010 16:53
    Last Modified: 20 Aug 2013 17:19
    References: Adler, Paul S. Goldoftas, B. & Levine, David (1999) Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System. Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 43-68. Ballard, Glenn & Howell, Gregory (1998) Shielding Production: Essential Step in Production Control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11-17. Burbidge, John L. (1990) Production control: a universal conceptual framework. Production Planning & Control, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-16. Edelson, Norman M. & Bennett, Carole L. (1998) Process Discipline. Quality Resources, New York. 216 p. Galsworth, Gwendolyn (1997) Visual Systems: harnessing the power of a visual workplace. AMACOM, New York. 320 p. Greif, Michel (1991) The Visual Factory. Productivity Press, Cambridge. 281 p. Hopp, Wallace & Spearman, Mark. (1996). Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston. 668 p. Imai, Masaaki (1986) Kaizen, the key to Japan’s competitive success. Random House, New York. 259 p. Johnston, R.B. (1995) Making manufacturing practices tacit: a case study of computer aided production management and lean production. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 46, 1174-1183. Johnston, R.B. & Brennan, M. (1996) Planning or Organizing: the Implications of Theories of Activity for Management of Operations. Omega, Int. J. Mgmt. Sc., Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 367-384. Johnston, R.B. (2000) Situated Action, Structuration and Actor-Network Theory: An Integrative Perspective. ECIS 2001 the 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia (under review). Koskela, Lauri (2000). An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Espoo, VTT Building Technology. 296 p. VTT Publications; 408. WWW: http://www.inf.vtt.fi/pdf/publications/2000/P408.pdf Lillrank, Paul (1995) The Transfer of Management Innovations from Japan. Organization Studies, 16/6, pp. 971-989. Monden, Yasuhiro (1994) Toyota Production System. Second Edition. Chapman & Hall, London. 423 p. Nakamura, S. (1993) The New Standardization. Productivity, Portland, OR. 268 p. Shewhart, W.A. (1931) Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand, New York. 501 p. Shingo, Sh. (1988). Non-stock production. Productivity Press, Cambridge, Ma. 454 p. Spear, Steven & Bowen, H. Kent (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp. 97-106. Stalk, G. Jr. & Hout, T.M. (1990) Competing against time. Free Press, New York. 285 p. Walton, Mary (1986) The Deming Management Method. Putnam, New York. 262 p. Womack, James P. & Jones, Daniel T. (1996) Lean Thinking. Simon & Schuster, New York. 350 p. Wruck, Karen H. & Jensen, Michael (1994) Science, specific knowledge, and Total Quality Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 247-287.
    URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/9423

    Actions (login required)

    Edit record (repository staff only)

    No Altmetrics available

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics