Coates, P, Arayici, Y, Koskela, K, Kagioglou, M, Usher, C and O'Reilly, K 2010, The key performance indicators of the BIM implementation process , in: The International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering , June 30 - July 2 2010, Nothingham, UK.

Preview	PDF - Accepted Version Download (115kB) | Preview
	Microsoft Word - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (89kB)

Abstract

Contemporarily some firms in the construction industry are attempting to adopt a BIM method of working. Each of these attempts reflects a varying BIM adoption philosophy and inevitably different BIM technologies, implementation strategies and roadmaps. On the other hand, all these attempts are often motivated to attain competitive advantages for product delivery in the market place. The question of what the best method of adopting BIM has not been answered yet. That is to say, it is required to identify a standard method that will benchmark the different BIM adoption cases by comparing the efficiency gains in these cases: a standard benchmarking method can help the stakeholders to decide on the most appropriate strategies for themselves. This paper explains the live experience of BIM adoption in a KTP (Knowledge Transfer Partnership) project, undertaken between the University of Salford and John McCall Architects practicing in the housing and regeneration fields, with a particular focus on a set of KPIs that have been developed and tested through the action research strategy in the project. Weighting of these KPI’s has been developed from an architectural business perspective

Actions (login required)