Arntzen, JW, Goudie, I, Halley, J and Jehle, R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0545-5664
2004,
'Cost comparison of marking techniques in long-term population studies: PIT-tags versus pattern maps'
, Amphibia-Reptilia, 25 (3)
, pp. 305-315.
![]() |
PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (845kB) | Request a copy |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568538041975116
Abstract
Conservation biology requires the assessment of demographic parameters and life-history data in wildlife populations. Such data can be gathered through capture-mark-recapture (CMR) of individuals. Marking techniques may vary for study organisms, research objectives and conditions, but all CMR studies have in common that the workload and expenditure is substantial, urging for cost-effective planning.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Themes: | Subjects / Themes > Q Science > QH Natural history > QH001 General, inc. conservation, geographical distribution Subjects / Themes > Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology Subjects outside of the University Themes |
Schools: | Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences > Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre |
Journal or Publication Title: | Amphibia-Reptilia |
Publisher: | Kluwer |
Refereed: | Yes |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Institutional Repository |
Date Deposited: | 28 Aug 2009 10:49 |
Last Modified: | 16 Feb 2022 08:32 |
URI: | http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/2223 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit record (repository staff only) |