Are the arms and head required to accurately estimate centre of mass motion during running?

Gill, N ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-8896, Preece, SJ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-732X, Young, S and Bramah, CA ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-9873 2017, 'Are the arms and head required to accurately estimate centre of mass motion during running?' , Gait & Posture, 51 , pp. 281-283.

Preview	PDF - Accepted Version Download (308kB) | Preview
	Microsoft Word - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (127kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Accurate measurement of centre of mass (CoM) motion can provide valuable insight into the biomechanics of human running. However, full-body kinematic measurement protocols can be time consuming and difficult to implement. Therefore, this study was performed to understand whether CoM motion during running could be estimated from a model incorporating only lower extremity, pelvic and trunk segments. Full-body kinematic data was collected whilst (n = 12) participants ran on a treadmill at two speeds (3.1 and 3.9 ms−1). CoM trajectories from a full-body model (16-segments) were compared to those estimated from a reduced model (excluding the head and arms). The data showed that, provided an offset was included, it was possible to accurately estimate CoM trajectory in both the anterior-posterior and vertical direction, with root mean square errors of 5 mm in both directions and close matches in waveform similarity (r = 0.975-1.000). However, in the ML direction, there was a considerable difference in the CoM trajectories of the two models (r = 0.774–0.767). This finding suggests that a full-body model is required if CoM motions are to be measured in the ML direction. The mismatch between the reduced and full-body model highlights the important contribution of the arms to CoM motion in the ML direction. We suggest that this control strategy, of using the arms rather than the heavier trunk segments to generate CoM motion, may lead to less variability in CoM motion in the ML direction and subsequently less variability in step width during human running.

Item Type:	Article
Schools:	Schools > School of Health and Society > Centre for Health Sciences Research
Journal or Publication Title:	Gait & Posture
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0966-6362
Related URLs:	Publication
Funders:	University of Salford
Depositing User:	SJ Preece
Date Deposited:	17 Nov 2016 11:08
Last Modified:	15 Feb 2022 21:26
URI:	https://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/40787

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only)