Urban sloths : public knowledge, opinions, and interactions

Pereira, K, Young, RJ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8407-2348, Boere, V and Silva, I 2018, 'Urban sloths : public knowledge, opinions, and interactions' , Animals, 8 (6) , #90.

PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (788kB) | Preview


Free-range sloths living in an urban environment are rare. In this study, the opinions, attitudes, and interactions with a population of Bradypus variegatus were investigated through short, structured interviews of people in the pubic square where the sloths live, in addition to informal, opportunistic observations of human-sloth interactions. A questionnaire was applied to people in the square where the sloths reside, and informal, opportunistic observations of human-sloth interactions were made. 95% of respondents knew of the sloths’ existence in the square and 87.8% liked their presence. Opinions about population size differed greatly and younger people were concerned as to whether the square was an appropriate place for them. Some human-sloth interactions showed the consequences of a lack of biological knowledge. People initiated all sloth-human interactions. The fact that sloths are strictly folivorous has avoided interactions with humans and, consequently, mitigated any negative impacts of the human-animal interaction on their wellbeing. These results demonstrate that, while there is a harmonious relationship between people and sloths, actions in environmental education of the square’s public could be beneficial for the sloths.

Item Type: Article
Schools: Schools > School of Environment and Life Sciences > Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre
Journal or Publication Title: Animals
Publisher: MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Professor Robert Young
Date Deposited: 12 Jun 2018 13:26
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2022 23:23
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/47305

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)


Downloads per month over past year