Average of trial peaks versus peak of average profile : impact on change of direction biomechanics

Dos'Santos, T, Comfort, P ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-8626 and Jones, PA ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-7670 2020, 'Average of trial peaks versus peak of average profile : impact on change of direction biomechanics' , Sports Biomechanics, 19 (4) , pp. 483-492.

PDF - Accepted Version
Download (884kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (82kB) | Request a copy


The aims of this study were twofold: firstly, to compare lower limb kinematic and kinetic variables during a sprint and 90° cutting task between two averaging methods of obtaining discrete data (peak of average profile vs. average of individual trial peaks); secondly, to determine the effect of averaging methods on participant ranking of each variable within a group. Twenty-two participants, from multiple sports, performed a 90° cut, whereby lower limb kinematics and kinetics were assessed via 3D motion and ground reaction force (GRF) analysis. Six of the eight dependent variables (vertical and horizontal GRF; hip flexor, knee flexor, and knee abduction moments, and knee abduction angle) were significantly greater (p ≤ 0.001, g = 0.10-0.37, 2.74-10.40%) when expressed as an average of trial peaks compared to peak of average profiles. Trivial (g ≤ 0.04) and minimal differences (≤ 0.94%) were observed in peak hip and knee flexion angle between averaging methods. Very strong correlations (ρ ≥ 0.901, p <0.001) were observed for rankings of participants between averaging methods for all variables. Practitioners and researchers should obtain discrete data based on the average of trial peaks because it is not influenced by misalignments and variations in trial peak locations, in contrast to the peak from average profile.

Item Type: Article
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society > Centre for Health Sciences Research
Journal or Publication Title: Sports Biomechanics
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1476-3141
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Thomas Dos'Santos
Date Deposited: 03 Sep 2018 14:36
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2022 23:45
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/48191

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)


Downloads per month over past year