Nursing judgement and decision-making using the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) in children

Craske, J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2547-8209, Carter, B, Jarman, I and Tume, LN ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2547-8209 2017, 'Nursing judgement and decision-making using the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) in children' , Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73 (10) , pp. 2327-2338.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (479kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate registered children’s nurses’ approaches to the assessment and management of withdrawal syndrome in children. Background: Assessment of withdrawal syndrome is undertaken following critical illness when the child’s condition may be unstablewith competing differential diagnoses. Assessment tools aim to standardize and improve recognition of withdrawal syndrome. Making the right decisions in complex clinical situations requires a degree ofmental effort and it is not known hownursesmake decisionswhen undertaking withdrawal assessments. Design: Cognitive interviews with clinical vignettes. Methods: Interviews were undertaken with 12 nurses to explore the cognitive processes they used when assessing children using the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) tool. Interviews took place in Autumn 2013. Findings: Each stage of decision-making—noticing, interpreting and responding— presented cognitive challenges for nurses. When defining withdrawal behaviours nurses tended to blur the boundaries between Sedation Withdrawal Score signs. Challenges in interpreting behaviours arose from not knowing if the patient’s behaviour was a result of withdrawal or other co-morbidities. Nurses gave a range of diagnoses when interpreting the vignettes, despite being provided with identical information. Treatment responses corresponded to definite withdrawal diagnoses, but varied when nurses were unsure of the diagnosis. Conclusion: Cognitive interviews with vignettes provided insight into nurses’ judgement and decision-making. The SWS does not standardize the assessment of withdrawal due to the complexity of the context where assessments take place and the difficulties of determining the cause of equivocal behaviours in children recovering from critical illness

Item Type: Article
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society > Centre for Applied Research in Health, Welfare and Policy
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 0309-2402
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Dr Lyvonne Tume
Date Deposited: 04 Sep 2019 14:24
Last Modified: 04 Sep 2019 14:30
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/52209

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year