Changes in performance markers and wellbeing in elite senior professional rugby union players during a pre-season period : analysis of the differences across training phases

Grainger, A, Neville, R, Ditroilo, M and Comfort, P ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-8626 2020, 'Changes in performance markers and wellbeing in elite senior professional rugby union players during a pre-season period : analysis of the differences across training phases' , Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 23 (1) , pp. 20-26.

PDF - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the magnitude of change and association with variation in training load of two performance markers and wellbeing, over three pre-season training blocks, in elite rugby union athletes. Design: Observational. Methods: Twenty-two professional players (age 25 ± 5 years; training age 6 ± 5 years; body mass, 99 ± 13 kg; stature 186 ± 6 cm) participated in this study, with changes in lower (CMJ height) and upper body (bench press mean speed) neuromuscular function and self-reported wellbeing (WB) assessed during an 11-week period. Results: There was a small increase in CMJ height (0.27, ±0.17 – likely substantial; standardised effect size, ±95% confidence limits – magnitude-based inference) (p = 0.003), bench press speed (0.26, ±0.15 – likely substantial) (p = 0.001) and WB (0.26, ±0.12 – possibly substantial) (p < 0.0001) across the pre-season period. There was a substantial interaction in the effect of training load on these three variables across the three training phases. A two-standard deviation (2SD) change in training load was associated with: a small decrease in CMJ height during the power phase (−0.32, ±0.19 – likely substantial) (p = 0.001); a small reduction in bench press speed during the hypertrophy phase (−0.40, ±0.32 – likely substantial) (p = 0.02); and a small reduction in WB during the strength phase (−0.40, ±0.24 – very likely substantial) (p < 0.0001). The effects of changes in training load across other phases were either likely trivial, only possibly substantial, or unclear. Conclusions: The effect of training load on performance can vary both according to the type of training stimulus being administered and based on whether upper- or lower-body outcomes are being measured.

Item Type:	Article
Schools:	Schools > School of Health and Society > Centre for Health Sciences Research
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	1440-2440
Related URLs:	Publication
Depositing User:	Dr Paul Comfort
Date Deposited:	07 Nov 2019 16:46
Last Modified:	12 Mar 2020 15:00
URI:	http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/52798

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only)