Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading nursing journals : a retrospective observational study

Zhou, C, Wu, Y, Howarth, ML ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-024X, Hu, M and Cong, W 2019, 'Reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading nursing journals : a retrospective observational study' , BMC Medical Ethics, 20 (1) , p. 94.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (660kB) | Preview
[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (227kB) | Request a copy
[img] Microsoft Word - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (56kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background: Ethical considerations play a prominent role in the protection of human subjects in clinical research. To date the disclosure of ethical protection in clinical research published in the international nursing journals has not been explored. Our research objective was to investigate the reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in clinical research published in leading international nursing journals. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. All clinical research published in the five leading international nursing journals from the SCI Journal Citation Reports between 2015 and 2017 were retrieved to evaluate for evidence of ethical review. Results: A total of 2041 citations have been identified from the contents of all the five leading nursing journals that were published between 2015 and 2017. Out of these, 1284 clinical studies have been included and text relating to ethical review has been extracted. From these, most of prospective clinical studies (87.5%) discussed informed consent. Only half of those (52.9%) reported that written informed consent had been obtained; few (3.6%) reported oral consent, and few (6.8%) used other methods such as online consent or completion and return of data collection (such as surveys) to denote assent. Notably, 36.2% of those did not describe the method used to obtain informed consent and merely described that “consent was obtained from participants or participants agreed to join in the research”. Furthermore, whilst most of clinical studies (93.7%) mentioned ethical approval; 92.5% of those stated the name of ethical committee and interestingly, only 37.1% of those mentioned the ethical approval reference. The rates of reporting ethical approval were different between different study type, country, and whether financial support was received (all P<0.05). Conclusion: The reporting of ethics in leading international nursing journals demonstrates progress, but improvement of the transparency and the standard of ethical reporting in nursing clinical research is required.

Item Type: Article
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society > Centre for Applied Research in Health, Welfare and Policy
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Medical Ethics
Publisher: BioMed Central
ISSN: 1472-6939
Related URLs:
Depositing User: ML Howarth
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2019 09:57
Last Modified: 20 May 2020 07:08
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/53408

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year