Using Fraser’s model of “progressive neoliberalism” to analyse deinstitutionalization and community care

Cummins, ID ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-3835 2020, 'Using Fraser’s model of “progressive neoliberalism” to analyse deinstitutionalization and community care' , Critical and Radical Social Work, 8 (1) , pp. 77-93.

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 January 2021.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img] Microsoft Word - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (47kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This article will argue that Nancy Fraser’s notion of “progressive neoliberalism” (Fraser, 2017, 2019) provides a conceptual lens that can be effective in the development of a critical analysis of mental health policy in England and Wales during the period of deinstitutionalisation and community care. Mental health policies that came steeped in an originally progressive discourse of choice, empowerment and wider service user rights were introduced by governments largely committed to free market. In the UK and the USA, this produced the contradictory position where moves community orientated vision of mental health service provision were overseen by administrations that were committed to a small state and fiscal conservatism. There were similar developments in other areas. Fraser (2017, 2019) terms this mixture of socially progressive rhetoric and market economics- progressive neoliberalism. Fraser’s model of progressive neoliberalism argues that neoliberalism has colonised progressive discourses. The paper outlines this theoretical model and then applies it to the development of community care. It argues that policy responses to the perceived failings of community care focused on increased powers of surveillance. This includes the introduction of legislation that allows for compulsory treatment in the community. The focus on legislation was at the expense of social investment. The paper concludes that the introduction of austerity in the UK has strengthened these trends. For example, The Coalition Government (2010-2015) introduced new mental health policies such as No Decision about me without me which emphasised inclusive approaches to service organisation and delivery. At the same time, it followed social and economic policies that increased inequality, reduced welfare payments and entitlement, and cut services.These are all factors that contribute to higher levels of mental distress across society.

Item Type: Article
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society
Journal or Publication Title: Critical and Radical Social Work
Publisher: Policy Press
ISSN: 2049-8608
Related URLs:
Depositing User: ID Cummins
Date Deposited: 27 Jan 2020 09:36
Last Modified: 21 Apr 2020 14:00
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/56312

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)