An exploratory qualitative study of health professional perspectives on clinical outcomes in UK orthotic practice

Hall, N, Parker, D and Williams, AE ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1224-4347 2020, 'An exploratory qualitative study of health professional perspectives on clinical outcomes in UK orthotic practice' , Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 13 (1) , p. 49.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (605kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Despite potential savings to the National Health Service, the collection of data on outcomes of NHS orthotic services is patchy. Indeed, several reports into orthotic services in the UK have reported a lack of data relating to outcomes of care and highlighted the need to routinely measure outcomes to demonstrate efficacy of services. Whilst a previous study provided an overview of the use of outcome measures in orthotic practice and identified some barriers to their use, further questions emerged. Hence, this qualitative study aimed to explore orthotists’ opinions and personal experiences on the influences on outcomes, how appropriate and relevant outcomes can be measured and also how barriers to the use of outcome measures can be overcome. Methods: Following a review of the literature, an initial advisory group informed semi-structured questions. These were used to create dialogue in a focus group of 12 orthotists. Data from the focus group was transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis, creating themes and subthemes for discussion. Results: The setting of realistic and agreed goals through managing expectations, compromise and patient education/information were seen as factors that could inform and improve outcomes. Barriers to the collection of outcome measures were associated with inadequate technology to manage the data, lack of time to complete them, lack of training in them and difficulties selecting appropriate outcome measures for patients with complex problems managed by different health professionals. The participants discussed ways of addressing these barriers, such as the use of ‘snapshots’ and delegation of data collection. Conclusions: This study has revealed that measuring outcomes is considered to be an important activity. In order to achieve good outcomes, it is important to address patient expectations, discuss and establish joint goals for care at the outset and inform and include patients in the decision-making process. The identified barriers to measuring outcomes can be overcome with the solutions revealed by these participants. Hence, this study has contributed to current knowledge which has relevance for clinical practice and may provide the theoretical basis for future research.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ** From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router ** Licence for this article: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ **Journal IDs: eissn 1757-1146 **Article IDs: publisher-id: s13047-020-00416-w; manuscript: 416 **History: collection 12-2020; published_online 29-07-2020; online 29-07-2020; accepted 22-07-2020; registration 22-07-2020; submitted 21-04-2020
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
ISSN: 1757-1146
Related URLs:
Funders: East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, The Orthotic Education and Training Trust (OETT)
SWORD Depositor: Publications Router
Depositing User: Publications Router
Date Deposited: 04 Aug 2020 12:57
Last Modified: 05 Aug 2020 11:24
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/57749

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year