A systematic review of exercise prescription in patients with intermittent claudication : does pain matter?

Seed, SA, Harwood, AE, Sinclair, J, Pymer, S, Caldow, EJ ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-7157, Ingle, L, Egun, A and Birkett, ST 2021, 'A systematic review of exercise prescription in patients with intermittent claudication : does pain matter?' , Annals of Vascular Surgery, 77 , pp. 315-323.

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)


Current guidelines for intermittent claudication advocate exercise at moderate to maximal claudication pain. However, adherence rates to supervised exercise programmes (SEP) remain poor and claudication pain is a contributing factor. Limited evidence suggests that moderate or pain-free exercise may be just as beneficial and may be better tolerated. However, it remains unclear what 'level' of claudication pain is optimal for improving functional outcomes. We therefore conducted a systematic review to synthesise the evidence for exercise prescribed at different levels of claudication pain. The CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched up to October 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared at least two different intensities of claudication pain were included. Outcome measures included walking performance, adherence, quality of life and vascular function. Of 1,543 search results, two studies were included. Maximal walking distance improved by 100-128% in the moderate-pain SEP groups, and by 77-90% in the pain-free SEP groups. Importantly, there were no significant differences between the moderate-pain and pain-free SEP groups in either study for improvements in walking performance, though comparison to a maximal-pain SEP group was not made. The efficacy of SEPs for patients with intermittent claudication is irrefutable, though there is no consensus on the optimal level of pain. Therefore, adequately powered RCTs are required to compare the effect of pain-free SEPs, moderate-pain SEPs and maximal-pain SEPs on functional outcomes. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020213684). [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.]

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ** From PubMed via Jisc Publications Router **Journal IDs: eissn 1615-5947 **Article IDs: pubmed: 34464728; pii: S0890-5096(21)00567-7 **History: accepted 15-06-2021; revised 15-06-2021; submitted 19-04-2021
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society
Journal or Publication Title: Annals of Vascular Surgery
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0890-5096
Related URLs:
SWORD Depositor: Publications Router
Depositing User: Publications Router
Date Deposited: 29 Nov 2021 11:09
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2022 14:46
URI: https://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/61849

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)