A report on a focus group discussion on the local implementation of Medicines Use Reviews (MURS)

Hilton, A, Edmondson, H and Featherstone, VA 2007, A report on a focus group discussion on the local implementation of Medicines Use Reviews (MURS) , in: Health Services Research & Pharmacy Practice Conference, 2nd-3rd April 2007, School of Pharmacy, Keele University.

Full text not available from this repository.
Access Information: The published version of this poster abstract can be accessed using the link above.

Abstract

Introduction: The Hull and East Riding Pharmacy Research Network (HERPRN) is a pharmacy research network in England, providing support and research training enabling community pharmacists and their staff to undertake practice-based research. The research focus is on quality improvement in the framework of the new pharmacy contract especially service evaluation, audit, service user experience and training needs. Undertaking medicines use reviews (MURs) is an advanced service provided by community pharmacists as part of the pharmacy contractual framework. The aim of the service is to achieve patient adherence in medicine taking. Objectives: To gain feedback from an exploratory discussion with local community pharmacists about their experiences of undertaking MURs retrospectively during a one-year period. To generate further research questions on MUR provision. Research method: As part of an educational meeting hosted by HERPRN, a purposive sample of pharmacists representing multiples, independent and locum pharmacists was convened for a focus group to discuss MURs. The focus group was moderated by a non-pharmacist independent qualitative researcher as well as being co-moderated by the presenting author. Preliminary findings: • Pharmacists would welcome clarification about the extent of their clinical input and responsibilities following an MUR. • Redesigning the form would make it more user friendly. • Logistically, pharmacists experienced difficulty in maintaining normal pharmacy services and providing an MUR service. • Pharmacists felt that inadequate information was given to general practitioners and other health professionals about MURs, which they felt had impacted on the quality of communication and follow-up on action plans. • People who would benefit from MURs (e.g. the housebound) are not easily provided for within the present system. Conclusion: Local pharmacists believe that further research into MUR provision will be of benefit. Pharmacists’ and prescribers’ attitudes and experiences should be further explored. Acknowledgements: Commissioned and funded by the Hull and East Riding Pharmacy Research Network (HERPRN).

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Speech)
Themes: Subjects / Themes > R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Health and Wellbeing
Schools: Schools > School of Health and Society > Centre for Applied Research in Health, Welfare and Policy
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice : Special Issue: HSRPP Abstracts
Publisher: Wiley
Refereed: No
ISSN: 0961-7671
Related URLs:
Funders: Hull and East Riding Pharmacy Research Network (HERPRN)
Depositing User: Users 29196 not found.
Date Deposited: 17 Aug 2010 15:26
Last Modified: 27 Aug 2021 19:50
URI: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/9580

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)