Petrucci, C 2010, 'Parallel trade of pharmaceutical products : the ECJ finally speaks — comment on GlaxoSmithKline' , European Law Review (2) , pp. 275-286.
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (322kB) |
Abstract
This article reviews the ECJ’s judgment in GlaxoSmithKline that overturned some important findings of the CFI’s decision. It criticises the longstanding problematic distinction between anti-competitive object and effect and, in particular, whether distribution agreements that limit parallel trade fit into the category of agreement having an anti-competitive object. Given that the ECJ’s decision reasserted a multi-goal approach to EU competition law, it is argued that the judgment leaves some issues unresolved. Similarly, the issues of the effects of price regulation and research and development (R&D) funding have not been dealt with adequately.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Themes: | Subjects outside of the University Themes |
Schools: | Schools > Salford Business School > Salford Business School Research Centre |
Journal or Publication Title: | European Law Review |
Publisher: | Sweet & Maxwell |
Refereed: | Yes |
ISSN: | 0307-5400 |
Depositing User: | Mr Carlo Petrucci |
Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2011 10:32 |
Last Modified: | 16 Feb 2022 13:35 |
URI: | https://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/18980 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit record (repository staff only) |