Exploring relation types for literature-based discovery

Preiss, J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-5832, Stevenson, M and Gaizauskas, R 2015, 'Exploring relation types for literature-based discovery' , Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22 (5) , pp. 987-992.

PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (466kB) | Preview


Objective Literature-based discovery (LBD) aims to identify “hidden knowledge” in the medical literature by: (1) analyzing documents to identify pairs of explicitly related concepts (terms), then (2) hypothesizing novel relations between pairs of unrelated concepts that are implicitly related via a shared concept to which both are explicitly related. Many LBD approaches use simple techniques to identify semantically weak relations between concepts, for example, document co-occurrence. These generate huge numbers of hypotheses, difficult for humans to assess. More complex techniques rely on linguistic analysis, for example, shallow parsing, to identify semantically stronger relations. Such approaches generate fewer hypotheses, but may miss hidden knowledge. The authors investigate this trade-off in detail, comparing techniques for identifying related concepts to discover which are most suitable for LBD. Materials and methods A generic LBD system that can utilize a range of relation types was developed. Experiments were carried out comparing a number of techniques for identifying relations. Two approaches were used for evaluation: replication of existing discoveries and the “time slicing” approach.1 Results Previous LBD discoveries could be replicated using relations based either on document co-occurrence or linguistic analysis. Using relations based on linguistic analysis generated many fewer hypotheses, but a significantly greater proportion of them were candidates for hidden knowledge. Discussion and Conclusion The use of linguistic analysis-based relations improves accuracy of LBD without overly damaging coverage. LBD systems often generate huge numbers of hypotheses, which are infeasible to manually review. Improving their accuracy has the potential to make these systems significantly more usable

Item Type: Article
Schools: Schools > School of Computing, Science and Engineering
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1067-5027
Related URLs:
Funders: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Depositing User: J Preiss
Date Deposited: 11 Nov 2020 08:24
Last Modified: 16 Feb 2022 05:59
URI: https://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/58770

Actions (login required)

Edit record (repository staff only) Edit record (repository staff only)


Downloads per month over past year